8.4 Regenboogteam - Robert Malone letter.pdf

RW Malone MD, MS Consulting and Analytics for Biopharma 434-979-0090 357 Hebron Valley Rd, Madison, VA 22727 www.rwmalonemd.com Your World is Our World June 19, 2021 From: Robert W. Malone, MD, MS 357 Hebron Valley Rd, Madison, VA 22727 To: Whom it may Concern I am writing this letter to support Dr. Bridle’s good character and his right to freely express his scientific opinion, which is backed up by the literature and well informed deductive reasoning. I am a US-based physician and scientist with an extensive record of successful innovation in basic and applied science, pathology, molecular virology, immunology, vaccine development, biodefense, project management, clinical development, regulatory affairs, and bioethics. I have been working in this area since 1984, and have been through multiple outbreaks – usually supporting either pharmaceutical clients or the US Department of Defense. I have been granted “secret” clearance for the DoD. I played a key role in advancing the PHAC rVSV-ZEBOV Ebola vaccine candidate and engaging Merck in development, which resulted in the eventual licensure of this very important product of Canadian PHAC research. I am also the original inventor of mRNA vaccines and DNA vaccines. This claim is substantiated by academic publications as well a large suite of US and worldwide patents with a filing date of 1989.

I have independently assessed most of the data which serves as the basis for Dr. Bridle’s communications regarding safety risks associated with the COVID-19 genetic vaccines, concur with his findings, and have independently raised my concerns with the US FDA including speaking directly with CBER director Peter Marks. I am particularly alarmed and surprised by the bioethical positions being taken by the government of Canada regarding these experimental – stage vaccines, and very surprised. I have always considered the government and people of Canada to be eminently reasonable, almost to a fault. These policies appear contrary to what I have been trained as the bedrock principles of clinical research/human subjects bioethics. And then there is the censorship of legitimate academic discourse, which brings us back to the specific case of Dr. Bridle. In short, do his accusers have no shame? I am truly shocked. Again, this is contrary to everything I had ever believed about the people and culture of Canada. I guess I will need to re-think my assumptions about Canadian fundamental reasonableness – ey? Furthermore, these attacks on him will make him a global martyr and amplify his message.

Is that really good public policy? RW Malone MD, MS Consulting and Analytics for Biopharma 434-979-0090 357 Hebron Valley Rd, Madison, VA 22727 www.rwmalonemd.com Your World is Our World Please stop. Think about what is going on here. This is not fair. This is not right. This is not proper. Dr. Bridle has examined the data available to him and has drawn reasonable conclusions about the meaning of that data in toto. He is not profiting from this. There are no financial conflicts of interests. He is not someone seeking fame and fortune. He is doing what he can, in good faith, to help protect the people of Canada and the world – and particularly the adolescents and children. In sum, in regards to COVID-19, I find the general censorship of the government of Canada, the bioethical lapses, and this specific example involving Dr. Bridle to be particularly egregious, and inconsistent with all I had previously believed regarding the fundamental reasonableness and commitment to fairness of Canadian political and social culture. Please stop politicizing science. The scientific process requires dissent and discussion to arrive at truth. This is a central tenant. Dr. Bridle has spoken truth as he sees it. Others may interpret the data differently. My assessment is very much aligned with that of Dr. Bridle. That does not make it right or wrong. Time will sort this out.

But I am quite sure that the attempts to silence Dr. Bridle and damage his career and reputation are fundamentally wrong. Regardless of your or my individual assessments and opinions, please let science and the scientific process resolve this. These attacks on the credibility of Dr. Bridle and his good faith efforts to provide an alert concerning safety signals associated with these vaccines are highly inappropriate and counterproductive. I suspect that history will not look back on this kindly. Canadians have not always been on the right side of history – witness the indigenous peoples. But in my experience they do try to do the right and proper thing. So do the right thing here. Sincerely Robert W Malone, MD, MS