Bijlage 2.1 - Gebundelde ingediende zienswijzen omgevingsvisie

Zienswijzen ontwerp omgevingsvisie Meppel Overzicht ingediende zienswijzen, bijlage Nota beantwoording zienswijzen Omgevingsvisie Gemeente Meppel 17 februari 2025

Inhoudsopgave 1. Inleiding .............................................................................................................................................. 3 2. Zienswijzen ........................................................................................................................................ 4 2.1 Zienswijze 1 ................................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Zienswijze 2 ................................................................................................................................. 6 2.3 Zienswijze 3 ................................................................................................................................... 8 2.4 Zienswijze 4 ................................................................................................................................. 14 2.5 Zienswijze 5 ................................................................................................................................. 17 2.6 Zienswijze 6 ................................................................................................................................. 23 2.7 Zienswijze 7 .................................................................................................................................

27 2.8 Zienswijze 8 ................................................................................................................................. 28 2.9 Zienswijze 9 ................................................................................................................................. 34 2.10 Zienswijze 10 ............................................................................................................................. 40 2.11 Zienswijze 11 ............................................................................................................................. 41 2.12 Zienswijze 12 ............................................................................................................................. 45 2.13 Zienswijze 13 ............................................................................................................................. 46 2.14 Zienswijze 14 ............................................................................................................................. 51 2.15 Zienswijze 15 ............................................................................................................................. 56 2.16 Zienswijze 16 .............................................................................................................................

63 2.17 Zienswijze 17 ............................................................................................................................. 65 2.18 Zienswijze 18 ............................................................................................................................. 70 2.19 Zienswijze 19 ............................................................................................................................. 76 2.20 Zienswijze 20 ............................................................................................................................. 78 2.21 Zienswijze 21 ............................................................................................................................. 83 2.22 Zienswijze 22 ............................................................................................................................. 85 2.23 Zienswijze 23 ............................................................................................................................. 90 2.24 Zienswijze 24 ............................................................................................................................. 91 2.25 Zienswijze 25 ............................................................................................................................. 92 3.

Bijlagen ............................................................................................................................................. 97 3.1 Bijlagen Zienswijze 6 ................................................................................................................... 97 Bijlage 1 ......................................................................................................................................... 97 Bijlage 2 ....................................................................................................................................... 124 Bijlage 3 ....................................................................................................................................... 131 Bijlage 4 ....................................................................................................................................... 171 Bijlage 5 ....................................................................................................................................... 174 3.2 Bijlagen Zienswijze 9 ................................................................................................................. 182 ......................................................................................................................................................... 182

1. Inleiding In de reactienota Zienswijzen ontwerp omgevingsvisie Meppel is een samenvatting weergegeven van de ingediende zienswijzen. In dit document is de volledige inhoud van de ingediende zienswijzen terug te lezen. Daar waar van toepassing zijn persoonlijke gegevens, in het kader van AVG, verwijderd. De nummering is gelijk aan die in de reactienota.

2. Zienswijzen 2.1 Zienswijze 1

2.2 Zienswijze 2

2.3 Zienswijze 3

2.4 Zienswijze 4

2.5 Zienswijze 5

2.6 Zienswijze 6

Bijlagen zienswijze 6 vindt u in hoofdstuk 3 Bijlagen.

2.7 Zienswijze 7

2.8 Zienswijze 8

2.9 Zienswijze 9

Bijlage zienswijze 9 vindt u in hoofdstuk 3 Bijlagen.

2.10 Zienswijze 10

2.11 Zienswijze 11

2.12 Zienswijze 12

2.13 Zienswijze 13

2.14 Zienswijze 14

2.15 Zienswijze 15

2.16 Zienswijze 16

2.17 Zienswijze 17

2.18 Zienswijze 18

2.19 Zienswijze 19

2.20 Zienswijze 20

2.21 Zienswijze 21

2.22 Zienswijze 22

2.23 Zienswijze 23

2.24 Zienswijze 24

2.25 Zienswijze 25

3. Bijlagen 3.1 Bijlagen Zienswijze 6 Bijlage 1 Richard Lindzen Professor of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, Emeritus Massachusetts Institute of Technology

William Happer Professor of Physics, Emeritus Princeton University

Steven Koonin University Professor, New York University, Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institute

November 30, 2023 Court of Appeals The Hague The Hague The Netherlands Re: Shell v. Milieudefensie et al. — Expert Opinion prepared for Foundation 'Environment and Man' (Stichting 'Milieu en Mens', M&M) This expert opinion has been prepared for the Foundation 'Environment and Man' (Stichting 'Milieu en Mens', M&M) to be submitted to the Hague Court of Appeals in Shell v. Milieudefensie et al, in which M&M has intervened (the 'Climate Case'). This opinion was jointly authored and represents our joint opinion. Our time spent producing this opinion has been provided pro bono. We are career physicists who have specialized in radiation physics, dynamic heat transfer and computer modelling for decades, subjects directly relevant to the global warning debate. Each of us has published over 200 peer-reviewed papers, many on the science of climate or closely related subjects. Our curricula vitae are attached in the appendix. In our opinion, the District Court of The Hague findings that "dangerous" climate change and extreme weather are caused by C02 emissions from fossil fuels are contradicted by the scientific method and only supported by the unscientific methods of government opinions, consensus, peer review, and cherry-picked or falsified data. Science demonstrates fossil fuels and C02 will not cause dangerous climate change.

Rather, there will be disastrous consequences for people worldwide if fossil fuels and C02 emissions are reduced to "net zero," including mass starvation. Specifically, our opinion is organized around the following key issues that have arisen in the District Court of The Hague in the Climate Case: — First, there will be disastrous consequences for the poor, people worldwide, future generations, and the West if fossil fuel and C02 emissions are reduced to "net zero," including mass starvation and loss of reliable and inexpensive energy.

— This action will undermine human rights with which the Climate Case is concerned, and cripple the realization of the first three UN sustainable development goals (SDGs) -- no poverty, zero hunger, and good health and wellbeing.1 — Second, the Court in first instance equated the state of climate science with the reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). In Part Il we demonstrate the IPCC reports have no value as science because the IPCC is government controlled. Thus the IPCC represents only government opinions, not science, and thus provides no scientific basis for the Court2's opinion. — Third, this Court in first instance found that "dangerous" climate change and extreme weather are caused by C02 emissions from fossil fuels. We demonstrate in Part Ill these conclusions are contradicted by the scientific method and only supported by the unscientific methods of consensus, peer review, government opinions and cherrypicked or falsified data. Hundreds of research papers confirm the highly beneficial effects of increased concentrations of atmospheric C02, especially in dry farming areas.

I

UN SDGs, https://sdgs.un.org/goals

Table of Contents

1. THERE WILL BE DISASTROUS CONSEQUENCES FOR THE POOR, PEOPLE WORLDWIDE, FUTURE GENERATIONS AND THE WEST IF FOSSIL FUELS AND C02 EMISSIONS ARE REDUCED TO "NET ZERO" A. C02 is Essential to Our Food, and Thus to Life on Earth B. More C02, Including C02 from Fossil Fuels, Produces More Food. C. More C02 Increases Food in Drought-Stricken Areas. D. Greenhouse Gases Prevent Us from Freezing to Death E. Enormous Social Benefits of Fossil Fuels F. "Net Zeroing" Fossil Fuels Will Cause Massive Human Starvation by Eliminating Nitrogen Fertilizer

11. THE IPCC IS GOVERNMENT CONTROLLED AND THUS ONLY ISSUES GOVERNMENT OPINIONS, NOT SCIENCE, THUS PROVIDES NO SCIENTIFIC BASIS FOR THE COURT'S OPINION 111. SCIENCE DEMONSTRATES FOSSIL FUELS AND C02 WILL NOT CAUSE DANGEROUS CLIMATE CHANGE AND EXTREME WEATHER A. Reliable Science is Based on Validating Theoretical Predictions With Observations, Not Consensus, Peer Review, Government Opinion or Cherry-Picked or Falsified Data B. The Models Predicting Catastrophic Warming and Extreme Weather Fail the Key Scientific Test: They Do Not Work, and Would Never Be Used in Science. C. 600 Million Years of C02 and Temperature Data Contradict the Theory That High Levels of C02 Will Cause Catastrophic Global Warming. D. Atmospheric C02 Is Now "Heavily Saturated," Which in Physics Means More C02 Will Have Little Warming Effect. E. The Theory Extreme Weather is Caused by Fossil Fuels and C02 is Contradicted by the Scientific Method and Thus is Scientifically Invalid CONCLUSIONS

3

1. THERE WILL BE DISASTROUS CONSEQUENCES FOR THE POOR, PEOPLE WORLDWIDE, FUTURE GENERATIONS, AND THE WEST IF FOSSIL FUELS AND C02 EMISSIONS ARE REDUCED TO "NET ZERO" A. C02 is Essential to Our Food, and Thus to Life on Earth. Carbon dioxide is the miracle molecule of life. It is the basis for nearly all life on earth. We owe our existence to green plants that, through photosynthesis, convert C02 and water to carbohydrates and oxygen with sunlight. Land plants get the carbon they need from the C02 in the air. In turn, livestock depend on the availability of green plants to consume, so that humans can consume the livestock. Without C02, there would be no food and thus no human or other life.

B. More C02, Including C02 from Fossil Fuels, Produces More Food. Increasing C02 in the atmosphere increases the amount of food that plants produce, a phenomenon called "fertilization." Thousands of experimental results demonstrate that more C02 usually increases the amount of food that plants produce. 1 A graphic illustration of the response of plants to increases in C02 is shown below. Dr. Sherwood Idso grew Eldarica (Afghan) pine trees with increasing amounts of C02 in experiments, starting with an ambient C02 concentration of 385 ppm. He showed what happens when C02 is increased from 385 ppm to 535 ppm, 685 ppm and 835 ppm over 10 years. 2

See, e.g., NIPCC, Climate Change Reconsidered 11: Biological Impacts (2014); Craig Idso, "What Rising C02 Means For Global Food Security" C02 Coalition (2019); Plant Growth Database, CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF CARBON DIOXIDE AND 1

GLOBAL CHANGE,

http://www.C02science.org/data/plant_growth/dry/dry_subiect.php. 2 Craig Idso, Increased Plant Productivity: The First Key Benefit ofAtmospheric C02 Enrichment, MASTER RESOURCE (Apr. 21, 2022), https://www.masterresource.org/carbon-dioxide/increased-plant-productivitythefirst-key-benefit-of-atmospheric-c02-enrichment/; C02 COALITION, https ://c02coal ition.org/wp-content/uploads/2021 /08/C02_3 .jpg.