RIS321703 Bijlage 2 Participatie

Participation report - Hof van Scheveningen 17 application for a building permit for roof extension 27 August 2024

In consultation with and in follow up to the letter dated 30 July 2024 - VTH2024-08563 Verzoek om aanvullende gegevens aanvraag, we hereby present this report on involving and informing interested parties regarding our plan to build a roof extension. These parties include:

1. The owners of Hof van Scheveningen 19 2. The renter currently living in Hof van Scheveningen 15 3. The owners of Hof van Scheveningen 15

1. Hof van Scheveningen 19: On 13 August, 2024 we met with our neighbors and to both introducé ourselves as neighbors and discuss our construction plans. We informed them in advance that we would like to discuss our plans to build a roof extension to allowthem to considerthe ramifications. During our meeting we described the planned construction, showed them the plans we submitted, looked at neighbors’ extensions as an example, updated them on the status of our application, asked them whether they had any concerns, and informed them that they could object to the plan. We noted that the planned construction would not interfere with anyfuture construction on their roof.

Concerns: their concerns focused on noise from construction during working hours, as currently works from home. We noted this concern and hope to mitigate it as best as possible, as well as any other negative effects of building in conversation with the contractor. We informed them that we plan to live at home during construction and would be present for conversations with the contractor and neighbors. They also shared a concern regarding the construction’s effect on sunlight to their back garden, but upon examination they determined that the planned extension would not have much of a negative effect.

The neighbors also voiced their hope to build an extension in future as well, and we committed to update them on any progress or other Information and welcomed them to share any concerns or problems as they arise.

2.

Hof van Scheveningen 15 - renter

On 25 August, 2024 we held a phone call with our neighborwho is a longterm renter. We tried to coordinate an in-person meeting, but due to the summer vacation and his busy business travel Schedule we settled on a phone call, after informing him of the subject matter we wished to discuss with him so that he could prepare.

We presented our plan to gave the neighbors’ existing construction as an example of the planned construction, offered to show him the plans, updated him on the status of the application and informed him that he or the houseowner could object. We also informed him that we would meet with the houseowner as well. We also invited him to share any concerns. was not interested in seeing plans and noted that since the plans are identical or very similar to existing roof extensions, this was not important to him at this time. He shared that he travels frequentlyfor work, and when he is in Den Haag works from an office, therefore he is not concerned with the effects of construction work during work hours. He said that he regards such construction as normal and has no objections.

We committed to updating him regarding any progress and offered to show plans or discuss any further concerns. 3.

Hof van.Scheveningen.15 - owner

We contacted the owner, who does not reside in the house and asked to speak to him regarding our plan, thereby making him aware of our application. He responded positively but has so far not been able to coordinate a time to speak, aware of our application.